UCI sued for £1.25m by sponsor

The International Cycling Union (UCI) are being sued by a sponsor for a “total loss of confidence in professional cycling by the public”.

Armstrong report key claims

Lance Armstrong

  • Achievements of USPS/Discovery Channel pro cycling team accomplished through the most sophisticated, professional and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen
  • Armstrong’s career at the team was fuelled from start to finish by doping
  • More than a dozen former team-mates, friends and former team employees confirm a fraudulent course of conduct
  • Armstrong acted with the help of a small army of enablers, including doping doctors, drug smugglers and others within and outside the sport and his team
  • He had ultimate control over not only his own personal drug use but over the doping culture of the team
  • Team staff were good at predicting when testers would turn up and seemed to have inside information
  • Evidence is beyond strong and as strong as any case ever brought by Usada

Australian company Skins has taken legal action for £1.25m for the UCI’s handling of the Lance Armstrong case.

Armstrong has been

stripped of seven Tour de France titles between 1999 and 2005 for doping.

Skins accuse UCI president Pat McQuaid and his predecessor Hein Verbruggen of “gross mismanagement”.

The UCI has commissioned an independent investigation into the Armstrong affair after the United States Anti-Doping Agency (Usada) claimed the American led

“the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen”.

Skins, a sports clothing manufacturer, has sponsored world cycling for five years and chairman Jaimie Fuller said: “The events of the last several months have made it abundantly clear that world cycling has not been the sport the general public and the corporate partners thought it was.

“Consequently, as chairman of a company that has made a significant financial and emotional investment, I am acting in order to send a message to the UCI and its senior office bearers that gross mismanagement and betrayal of trust is completely unacceptable.”

He added: “In fact, Mr McQuaid and Mr Verbruggen refused to even acknowledge that the problem was so entrenched until Usada forced them into submission.

“In short, we say that the UCI, Mr McQuaid and Mr Verbruggen have failed us, the sport and the public who love cycling.”

Article source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/20203638

Comments are closed.

Johnny’s favourite stores